Gone in a Heartbeat

In April Paul saw the cardiologist for a check-up. He had an electrocardiogram done and for extra measure a nuclear stress test (A radioactive tracer is injected to identify areas of decreased blood flow.) Both tests were normal. His mind at ease, he looked forward to a relaxing summer.

9 weeks later he was dead from a heart attack. He grabbed his chest, told his wife he was having pain, and collapsed. He was gone before he reached the hospital.

His death is a stark reminder of both the fragility of life and the inadequacy of medical science. Death remains certain and our ability to see it coming woefully inept. People like Paul die when we think they will live while others live far longer than expected. (I currently have a patient with widespread cancer. He was told he had less than 6 months to live, so he enrolled in hospice. That was 14 months ago.)

The certainty of death and the uncertainty of its timing seem to have little impact on how many of us go about our lives. We live in denial, planning to live to be 100 and die in our sleep. We put off vacations or delay retirement, focusing on financial goals. We ignore damaged relationships, telling ourselves we will reach out to estranged family and friends “eventually.” Many spend no time at all pondering what happens in the next life presuming eternity is either non-existent or blindly hoping that if it does exist we have been good enough to qualify for a good after-life.

Paul reminds us of the foolishness of this attitude. Tomorrow may never come, the remainder of our lives may be measured in days or hours instead of years. Now is the time to pay attention to our loved ones, mend relationships, and consider eternity, for “now” may be all the time we have left.

- Bart

Thanks for reading and sharing. Follow me on twitter @bartbarrettmd, or subscribe to the blog to receive posts by email. Comments are welcome!

 

Shooting Congressmen

A congressman is fighting for his life in a Washington DC hospital. He and other Republican members of congress were attacked while they practiced for a baseball game. Their attacker did not know them, had never met them, yet had concluded they needed to die. The shooter appointed himself judge, jury and executioner, imposing a death sentence on them for the crime of being conservative.

How did it come to this?

Several thoughts come to mind-

1-      Politics has become too important. When people blame all of their problems on government or look to government to provide all of the answers to their problems, those who oppose their views can be easily demonized. This is true on both sides. When we assign evil motives to our opponents we provide potential justification to harsh actions against them. Yoda said it well, “Anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.”

2-      Human life has lost its value. There was a time when people were valued because they were people. People were defined first and foremost by their humanity. Created in the image of God, all people deserved to be treated with dignity and respect. This was why our founding fathers embedded a prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment into our constitution. Even the worst people were thought to be deserving of some degree of dignity.

This is no longer true. We see people being beaten, bullied and attacked for what they believe. Our rhetoric has lost any semblance of dignity and respect. This week I saw a post in which someone called Jeff Sessions a “F-ing D-bag” (abbreviated for politeness.) The attorney general of the United States deserves more respect. He has served his state and the nation for 35 years. While he has been wrong at times (on many occasions I am sure) being wrong does not make you a D-bag. When we reduce people to epithets, when we ignore the good that is in them, we devalue all humanity.

3-      No one listens anymore. Everywhere I look, from the debates in congress to the comments on Facebook posts, I see put downs, insults and personal attacks. Opposing views are mocked and dismissed out of hand. No one seems interested in the truth coming out as much as they are in winning an argument. The resultant “us vs. them” posturing is damaging to our culture. It breeds anger and contempt for others.

It does not have to be this way. We can be better, we can work to focus on the good intentions of others, on their positive contributions and on common goals.

We need to assume the best in others. Both political parties want a better America for all Americans, a better healthcare system, safety for our citizens, education for our children and a thriving economy. We would all do well to remember these shared goals. We may disagree with others on how to achieve them but we need to stop assigning evil motives to those who disagree with us.

We need to remember that people are more important than politics.

- Bart

Thanks for reading and sharing. Follow me @bartbarrettmd, or subscribe to the blog to have posts delivered to your inbox. Comments are welcomed.

 

 

The Doctor Won't See You Now. And That's a Good Thing

It has been 6 months since my practice fully embraced digital medicine. Whenever possible we give patients the option of being treated without coming to the office. Several times a week we review text photos of medical conditions from rashes to pink eyes and respond with treatment plans. On a daily basis we treat high blood pressure and diabetes through secure email. Patients whose blood pressure was poorly controlled due to difficulty coming to the office are now perfectly controlled. Being busy is no longer an obstacle to care and patients are responding.

Thinking I am on to something, I have been sharing our new policy with other doctors. Everyone is interested in the idea but most don't think we are charging enough for the service. Our $120 a year annual fee leads to the conclusion that they would lose money if they adopted a similar practice. My reply that patients deserve this more convenient option is not persuasive.

I expected hesitancy and reluctance from my colleagues but one doctor’s response caught me off guard. When I told him that I was only requiring compliant hypertensive patients to come to the office once every two years he replied, “Sure, but you still have them come in for their annual physicals, right?”

I replied with a puzzled expression, “No, people don’t need physicals every year.”

“I know they don’t,” he said, “but we get paid for annual physicals.”

“But why bring them into the office if they don’t need to be there?” I replied, still not following his logic. 

“Because we make money and it doesn’t cost them anything!”

“It costs them a day off of work!” I replied.

After a few more minutes of debate I gave up. We have completely different views on the business of medicine. I walked away from the conversation with a new understanding of the problems our society faces as we try to address increasing health care costs. Doctors and hospital groups talk about lowering costs but want to make as much money as they can. If they get paid to do something most of them are going to do it, even if it is useless. 

It is easy to point fingers at doctors, but they are responding to basic economic instincts. They do what they get paid to do. Which means a large part of the blame should falls on those who pay for medical care. Insurance companies and government programs are a large part of the problem. Misguided wellness programs require healthy young patients to come to the doctor once a year and pay doctors handsomely for the visits. Obamacare requires insurers to offer physicals every year at no cost to the patient. Doctors know a cash cow when they see one and willingly go along with the program.

While willing to spend millions on unnecessary visits for healthy young people, most insurers do not pay anything at all for digital care. Many patients also fail to see the value in the service. When confronted with our annual fee over half of our patients were unwilling to pay the equivalent of $10 a month for the service. Modern healthcare access is not worth as much as their monthly Netflix or latte expenditures. Physicians who want to make a good living are left forcing patients to come to the office unnecessarily, because that is what they get paid for. 

My hope is that my pilot projectwill eventually catch on. As my patients tell their friends about the benefits of digital care perhaps the demand for such services will go up. If it does, other doctors may eventually follow. Even if they don’t, I will continue to provide these services to my patients. Having seen the benefits of this care for my patients I am convinced it is the right thing to do.

- Bart

Thanks for reading and for sharing with others. To read more about our digital access plan, you can read the explanation on my office blog. Comments and questions are welcome.

You can subscribe to the blog if you want posts to be sent to your email. You can also follow me on Twitter @bartbarrettmd

Life Lessons from Kathy Griffin

How to ruin your life, as demonstrated by Kathy Griffin

1-      Firmly take a position held by some and rejected by others.

2-      Surround yourself with people who agree with your position.

3-      Only read news reports and websites that share your view.

4-      In private and with your friends mock and belittle those who disagree with you.

5-      Tell yourself that those who disagree with you are not just wrong, but evil, bad, stupid, and less than human.

6-      Take your views public, assuming that everyone agrees with you.

7-      Blame others for the backlash when it comes.

It is easy to say that Kathy Griffin deserves all of the consequences from her symbolic beheading of Donald Trump, to shake our heads and wag our fingers and say she should have known better. The truth is that we are a lot like her. Almost all of us follow the first 5 steps on the list. The difference is that we do not have as big of a platform on which to display our ignorance and arrogance.

If there is a lesson to learn it is that we should question ourselves more and attack others less, and that we should strive to treat everyone with respect, especially those with whom we disagree.

-          Bart